HIGH AD0-E902 QUALITY - AD0-E902 EXAM OBJECTIVES PDF

High AD0-E902 Quality - AD0-E902 Exam Objectives Pdf

High AD0-E902 Quality - AD0-E902 Exam Objectives Pdf

Blog Article

Tags: High AD0-E902 Quality, AD0-E902 Exam Objectives Pdf, Exam Dumps AD0-E902 Free, AD0-E902 Test Fee, AD0-E902 Reliable Braindumps Ebook

Now passing Adobe certification AD0-E902 exam is not easy, so choosing a good training tool is a guarantee of success. Actual4Dumps will be the first time to provide you with exam information and exam practice questions and answers to let you be fully prepared to ensure 100% to pass Adobe Certification AD0-E902 Exam. Actual4Dumps can not only allow you for the first time to participate in the Adobe certification AD0-E902 exam to pass it successfully, but also help you save a lot of valuable time.

Adobe AD0-E902 Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Working with APIs: This section of the exam measures the skills of Integration Specialists and assesses knowledge of API interactions within Fusion. Candidates must handle rate-limiting errors, identify ways to integrate third-party APIs and determine the correct module types when built-in functionalities are unavailable. One critical skill evaluated is implementing a solution for API rate limits to ensure seamless integration.
Topic 2
  • Foundational Technical Concepts: This section of the exam measures the skills of Fusion Developers and covers core technical concepts related to data transformation, function nesting, and expression formation in Fusion. Candidates must understand how to modify field formats, use appropriate functions, and work with data manipulation techniques. One key skill evaluated is selecting the correct function to transform data between different formats.
Topic 3
  • Scenario Design and Architecture: This section of the exam measures the skills of Solution Architects and focuses on designing and structuring Fusion scenarios efficiently. Candidates must determine the correct steps to parse JSON, perform data lookups, and distinguish between different triggers. Understanding system limitations, module selection, and timezone handling is also essential. One key skill assessed is identifying the appropriate method for uploading documents while managing access controls.
Topic 4
  • Testing and Error Handling: This section of the exam measures the skills of Quality Assurance Engineers and evaluates the principles of testing and error handling in Fusion. Candidates must define test plans and test cases, identify directives for handling unreliable services, and configure custom error handling mechanisms. One specific skill tested is applying the correct error-handling directive to manage service disruptions.

>> High AD0-E902 Quality <<

AD0-E902 Exam Torrent & AD0-E902 Exam Preparation & AD0-E902 Test Dumps

The only way to save yourself from this scenario is by relying on Adobe AD0-E902 study material. Actual4Dumps equips you with the excellent Adobe AD0-E902 dumps material to help you clear the Adobe AD0-E902 real examination on the maiden attempt. One of the leading factors of Actual4Dumps in this industry is offering only top-rated and updated AD0-E902 Exams practice questions.

Adobe Workfront Fusion Professional Sample Questions (Q32-Q37):

NEW QUESTION # 32
A scenario is too large, with too many modules. Which technique can reduce the number of modules?

  • A. Setting the scenario to Auto Commit in scenario settings
  • B. Using a Compose a string module to combine variables and module output. Then use the Text Parser to parse the data and assign to variables
  • C. Nesting multiple mapping panel functions instead of setting and resetting variables when transforming data in more than one way

Answer: C

Explanation:
Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
* Problem Summary:
* The scenario has become too large due to the high number of modules.
* The goal is to reduce the number of modules by optimizing how data is transformed.
* Option Analysis:
* A. Nesting multiple mapping panel functions:
* Nesting multiple functions in the mapping panel (e.g., using if(), concat(), replace()) eliminates the need for separate modules to set and reset variables for each transformation.
* This is a highly efficient technique to transform data in fewer modules, making it the correct answer.
* B. Using a Compose a string module and Text Parser:
* This involves additional modules (Compose a string + Text Parser) instead of reducing the number of modules. It is not an optimal solution to this problem.
* C. Setting the scenario to Auto Commit:
* The Auto Commit setting helps with transactional control and does not reduce the number of modules in a scenario.
* Why Nesting Mapping Functions is Effective:
* Efficiency: Complex transformations can be performed inline within a single mapping panel.
* Readability: Proper nesting and naming conventions make it easier to understand the logic without adding unnecessary modules.
* Scalability: This approach keeps the scenario compact and reduces complexity as the scenario grows.
* How to Implement:
* Open the mapping panel in relevant modules.
* Use multiple nested functions like if(), concat(), add(), etc., within the mapping expressions.
* Test the mapping thoroughly to ensure correctness.


NEW QUESTION # 33

In a scenario, there are two aggregators displaying different numbers in the bundle inspector: Aggregator 1 displays a 1, and Aggregator 2 displays a 10. What is a possible reason for this difference?

  • A. The source module for the aggregators are different
  • B. The scenario's router is set to only allow projects through the route to Aggregator 1 and only allows tasks through the route to Aggregator 2
  • C. Aggregator 2 displays a 10 in the bundle inspector because it is set to repeat 10 times
  • D. Aggregator 1's route is set to process the 1st bundle only, and Aggregator 2's route is set to process all bundles

Answer: A

Explanation:
Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
* Understanding the Scenario:
* The diagram shows two routes, each leading to an aggregator module (Aggregator 1 and Aggregator 2).
* The bundle inspector indicates different output counts for the two aggregators: Aggregator 1 displays 1, and Aggregator 2 displays 10.
* Option Analysis:
* A. Aggregator 1's route is set to process the 1st bundle only, and Aggregator 2's route is set to process all bundles:
* Incorrect. Aggregators process data from their input modules based on their configuration.
While filters or limits might be applied earlier in the flow, the scenario does not suggest that the aggregator's configuration explicitly limits bundles in this way.
* B. The source module for the aggregators are different:
* Correct. The two aggregators receive input from different modules. For example, Aggregator 1 might aggregate bundles from "Projects," which outputs a single bundle, while Aggregator 2 aggregates bundles from "Issues," which outputs 10 bundles. This explains the differing numbers in the bundle inspector.
* C. Aggregator 2 displays a 10 in the bundle inspector because it is set to repeat 10 times:
* Incorrect. Aggregators do not "repeat" a specific number of times. Instead, they process the input bundles passed to them and output a result based on the aggregation logic.
* D. The scenario's router is set to only allow projects through the route to Aggregator 1 and only allows tasks through the route to Aggregator 2:
* Incorrect. While the router might direct specific bundles (e.g., "Projects" to Aggregator 1 and "Issues" to Aggregator 2), the difference in bundle counts is determined by the source modules, not by the router's configuration alone.
* Why Source Modules Determine Bundle Counts:
* Each aggregator processes data from a source module. If the source module outputs different numbers of bundles, the aggregators will show different bundle counts.
* In this example, "Projects" might output only 1 bundle (e.g., 1 project), while "Issues" outputs 10 bundles (e.g., 10 issues).
* How to Verify:
* Inspect the source modules feeding into each aggregator. Check the number of bundles they produce during the scenario run.
* Confirm that the aggregators are aggregating based on their respective inputs.
References:This explanation aligns with Workfront Fusion's handling of bundles and aggregation logic.
Differences in bundle counts at the aggregator level are typically due to differences in the source module outputs, as shown in the scenario.


NEW QUESTION # 34
A Fusion scenario updates project conditions each night, and should set the project condition to At Risk if there are any high priority open issues on the project. The scenario retrieves all open projects and cycles through the projects. For each project with issues, it retrieves all associated open issues, iterates through them and sets the project condition to At Risk if the issue is high priority or On Target if it is not.
A user notices that Fusion is updating the progress condition multiple times, once for each issue in the project.
How can the developer ensure the project is updated only once?

  • A. Apply the Run Once flow control function
  • B. Change the issue search module to result set of First Matching
  • C. Record Add an Ignore error directive as an error handler route for the update module
  • D. Create a separate scenario to update the overall project condition

Answer: D

Explanation:
Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
* Problem Summary:
* The Fusion scenario updates the project condition multiple times, once for each high-priority issue.
* The desired behavior is to update the project condition only once, based on the overall condition of all associated issues.
* Option Analysis:
* A. Change the issue search module to result set of First Matching:
* This would limit the search to only the first issue. However, this does not account for all issues on the project, leading to incomplete logic for setting the project condition.
* B. Add an Ignore error directive as an error handler route for the update module:
* Ignoring errors does not prevent multiple updates; it only suppresses errors in the workflow.
* C. Create a separate scenario to update the overall project condition:
* Correct. By separating the project update logic into a different scenario, the developer can ensure the condition is updated only once after analyzing all issues. The project condition is calculated holistically, based on the state of all high-priority issues.
* D. Apply the Run Once flow control function:
* "Run Once" controls execution at the scenario level, not within a module's iteration. It cannot prevent multiple updates in this context.
* Why Separate Scenario is Best:
* Simplifies Logic: A separate scenario can be designed to run after all issues have been checked, ensuring only one update per project.
* Avoids Redundancy: Prevents unnecessary API calls to update the same project multiple times.
* Improves Performance: Reduces the number of operations and bundles processed in the main scenario.
* Implementation:
* Create a separate scenario triggered after the issue-checking scenario completes.
* Use aggregate data (e.g., a data store or intermediate processing) to evaluate the overall project condition before performing a single update.


NEW QUESTION # 35
A Fusion designer is unhappy with the high number of bundles passing through an instant Watch Events module that monitors Workfront project updates.
Which action reduces the number of bundles passing through the module?

  • A. Changing the module type to Watch Record and applying criteria in the optional filter box
  • B. Reducing the maximum number of returned events on the trigger
  • C. Reducing the maximum number of cycles in scenario setting

Answer: A

Explanation:
* Understanding the Issue:
* TheWatch Eventsmodule is generating a high number of bundles because it monitors a broad range of project updates in Workfront, resulting in an overwhelming amount of data passing through the scenario.
* The goal is to reduce the number of bundles by narrowing the scope of monitored events.
* Why Option C is Correct:
* Switching to Watch Record:
* TheWatch Recordmodule allows users to monitor specific records (e.g., projects, tasks) with additional filtering options in thecriteriaorfilter box.
* By applying filters, the module can focus only on relevant updates, significantly reducing the number of bundles being processed.
* Example: Filtering for specific project statuses, update types, or assigned users ensures that only relevant changes are captured.
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option A ("Reducing the maximum number of returned events on the trigger"):
* This limits the number of bundles processed per cycle but does not address the root cause, which is the broad monitoring scope of theWatch Eventsmodule.
* Option B ("Reducing the maximum number of cycles in scenario settings"):
* The number of cycles determines how many iterations the scenario performs in one run but does not reduce the number of bundles entering the scenario.
* Steps to Use the Watch Record Module:
* Replace theWatch Eventsmodule withWatch Record.
* Specify the record type to monitor (e.g., Project).
* Use the optional filter box to apply criteria, such as specific project fields, statuses, or other conditions.
* Activate the scenario to test the refined data flow.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion: Watch Record Module
* Workfront Community: Managing High Bundle Volumes in Fusion


NEW QUESTION # 36
A Fusion designer discovers that an iteration is processing thousands of bundles, though it should not need to.
What should the designer do to reduce the number of bundles?

  • A. Configure the trigger module to filter out unnecessary records
  • B. Configure the scenario settings to reduce the number of cycles per execution
  • C. Configure the trigger module to reduce the maximum number of results that Fusion will process during one execution cycle

Answer: A

Explanation:
Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
* Problem Summary:
* A trigger module is causing excessive iteration processing thousands of bundles unnecessarily.
* The goal is to optimize the scenario by reducing the number of processed bundles.
* Option Analysis:
* A. Configure the trigger module to reduce the maximum number of results:
* Reducing the maximum number of results processed per cycle limits the number of bundles processed at a time, but it does not solve the root issue of processing unnecessary records.
* B. Configure the trigger module to filter out unnecessary records:
* Filtering at the trigger level ensures that only the required records are fetched for processing, addressing the root cause of excessive bundle processing. This is the correct answer.
* C. Configure scenario settings to reduce cycles per execution:
* Limiting execution cycles reduces the overall runtime but does not directly address the number of bundles being processed unnecessarily.
* Why Filtering at the Trigger is Best:
* Efficiency: By setting up filters directly in the trigger, you ensure that only relevant data is retrieved.
* Performance: Reducing the number of unnecessary bundles improves processing speed and reduces resource usage.
* Accuracy: Filtering ensures only actionable data enters the workflow, maintaining scenario integrity.
* How to Implement:
* Open the trigger module settings.
* Add appropriate filters to exclude unnecessary records. For example:
* Add conditions to filter out old data or irrelevant statuses.
* Use fields like updatedDate, status, or any other criteria relevant to the workflow.
* Test the trigger module to verify that only relevant bundles are retrieved.
References:These answers are based on Workfront Fusion best practices for optimizing scenarios, as outlined in the Fusion documentation. Proper use of mapping panel functions and trigger filters ensures scenarios are efficient and scalable.


NEW QUESTION # 37
......

There is a way to clear your AD0-E902 certification exam without finding the best source of help. As an applicant for the Adobe Workfront Fusion Professional (AD0-E902) exam, you need actual Adobe AD0-E902 exam questions to know how you can score well and attempt it successfully. You can visit Actual4Dumps to get the best quality AD0-E902 Practice Test material for the AD0-E902 exam.

AD0-E902 Exam Objectives Pdf: https://www.actual4dumps.com/AD0-E902-study-material.html

Report this page